WordPress database error: [Duplicate entry '65028' for key 1]
INSERT INTO wp_bas_visitors (visit_ip, referer, osystem, useragent, lasthere) VALUES (644300602, 2, 404, 2482, '2008-11-21 05:52:03');

WordPress database error: [You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'AND referer = referer_id AND osystem = os_id AND useragent = ua_]
SELECT * FROM wp_bas_visitors, wp_bas_refer, wp_bas_ua, wp_bas_os WHERE visit_id = AND referer = referer_id AND osystem = os_id AND useragent = ua_id

WordPress database error: [You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ' '2008-11-21 05:52:03', 0, 231)' at line 1]
INSERT INTO wp_bas_log (visit, stamp, outbound, page) VALUES (, '2008-11-21 05:52:03', 0, 231);

Comments on: Perspective: Statement of Principles by CAR MLS Working Group http://psyne.net/blog4/2007/09/15/perspective-statement-of-principles-by-car-mls-working-group/ Real Tech from the Trenches Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:52:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3 By: FBS Blog » Blog Archive » Comments on CAR’s MLS Working Group Statement of Principles http://psyne.net/blog4/2007/09/15/perspective-statement-of-principles-by-car-mls-working-group/#comment-41 FBS Blog » Blog Archive » Comments on CAR’s MLS Working Group Statement of Principles Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:48:17 +0000 http://psyne.net/blog4/2007/09/15/perspective-statement-of-principles-by-car-mls-working-group/#comment-41 [...] Mark Flavin comments today on the Statement of Principles by the CAR MLS Working Group, and I’ve added my own thoughts by commenting on the Future of MLS Wiki.  I’m hopeful that I won’t have to cross-post for too long, but, until traction is gained over there, I’ll be posting both here and there. [...] […] Mark Flavin comments today on the Statement of Principles by the CAR MLS Working Group, and I’ve added my own thoughts by commenting on the Future of MLS Wiki.  I’m hopeful that I won’t have to cross-post for too long, but, until traction is gained over there, I’ll be posting both here and there. […]

]]> By: Michael Seguin http://psyne.net/blog4/2007/09/15/perspective-statement-of-principles-by-car-mls-working-group/#comment-40 Michael Seguin Sat, 15 Sep 2007 19:18:45 +0000 http://psyne.net/blog4/2007/09/15/perspective-statement-of-principles-by-car-mls-working-group/#comment-40 I will add that I believe the key to content standardization lies in the 'standardization of the RETS standard' and the content compliance this would in turn create within the MLS systems themselves (While RETS is a standard language for MLS's, there are multiple versions and levels of compliance). It is important to note that standardization is such a laudable goal that it can lead to thoughts of a standard MLS. While in some regards this is tempting, we cannot forget that competition sparks creativity. I personally believe that we are better off with numerous competitive MLS products. However, I also see the need for a new breed of 'MLS agnostic' tools that sit between the MLS, the board, and the consumer to allow for much easier content input and output. Where are the listing input widgets that can point to any MLS through bi-directional RETS? Where are the inter-MLS content translators? These sorts of tools might allow for the competition within the traditional real estate industry that can allow it to regain a competitive edge against the 'interlopers,' and at the same time allow for genuine content malleability between MLS and search systems. I will add that I believe the key to content standardization lies in the ’standardization of the RETS standard’ and the content compliance this would in turn create within the MLS systems themselves (While RETS is a standard language for MLS’s, there are multiple versions and levels of compliance). It is important to note that standardization is such a laudable goal that it can lead to thoughts of a standard MLS. While in some regards this is tempting, we cannot forget that competition sparks creativity. I personally believe that we are better off with numerous competitive MLS products. However, I also see the need for a new breed of ‘MLS agnostic’ tools that sit between the MLS, the board, and the consumer to allow for much easier content input and output. Where are the listing input widgets that can point to any MLS through bi-directional RETS? Where are the inter-MLS content translators? These sorts of tools might allow for the competition within the traditional real estate industry that can allow it to regain a competitive edge against the ‘interlopers,’ and at the same time allow for genuine content malleability between MLS and search systems.

]]>